(Non)-Uniqueness of Net Names
Gartha S. Parrish gsp at merit.edu
Wed Jul 7 22:06:55 CEST 1993
I agree with Daniel that unique network names do serve a purpose. In addition to making it easier to discuss a specific network, there is a recognition factor associated with a network name that just does not exist with an internet address. I have discovered many errors because a net name didn't look right and when I checked, there was either a typo or some kind of mix-up with the number/numbers. I would hate to see this error-checking "feature" removed. I would vote for keeping network names unique at least to the level of the organization or site. This would leave the level of granularity up to individual organizations. Network names would still be registered in the InterNIC and RIPE whois databases, and multiples would appear much as a block entry looks now. This would also be helpful in cases where troubleshooting is needed and either administrative or technical contacts must be reached. Gartha Parrish NSFNET/MERIT ================================================================
[ lir-wg Archives ]