RFC1366 Revision
Daniel Karrenberg Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Feb 16 18:14:05 CET 1993
> Havard.Eidnes at runit.sintef.no writes: > > Oh, well... If some of you remember the form I sent to you as input to the > common form, I specifically stated that even a class C network can be > subnetted, and that such a strategy could be useful to conserve some > address space. From the above, I read that this is not the intention > anymore. Can someone explain why? (This is a section where the new > version differs a bit from RFC 1366.) I can't that was one of the questions I had as well. I have had legitimate cases with 2-4 hosts / subnet and allocating 1C for each is wasteful. We should go CIDR right away. Daniel
[ lir-wg Archives ]