[irrtoolset]peval & whois.ripe.net
Fredrik Widell fredrik at sunet.se
Thu Nov 18 09:36:53 CET 2004
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Engin Gunduz wrote: > Dear Fredrik, > Sorry for the late answer. > > I hope your problem has already been solved when we have > put the new hardware into production, which is much faster. > This should have solved the long query response time problem. Yes, absolutely, but I still wonder why the expansion of AS702:RS-CUSTOMER actually was totally wrong, it would have been better with no answer at all, will this happen again in a couple of years when it is time to change the hw for the whois-server? it trashes peerings in a very bad manner if/when it happens, so I'm just curious. Otherwise the current whois-server is fast as **** :) > > Regards, > > -- > Engin Gunduz > RIPE NCC Software Engineering Departmen > > On 2004-11-08 12:55:51 +0100, Fredrik Widell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> currently (and for the last 1-2 weeks) I am utterly unable >> to fetch/make filterlists for peers with large as-sets, >> to mee it seems whois.ripe.net is quite unresponsive, and >> sometimes even delivers the wrong results with peval, >> the example I have most trouble with atm below: >> >> peval -h whois.ripe.net -protocol ripe -no-as "AS702 AS702:RS-EURO >> AS702:RS-CUSTOMER" >> >> mostly, this justs exits with a "141 pipe broken", but, sometimes >> the result is ((AS702)) which is very far from the truth. >> >> So, can I still trust ripe-dbm to create my filterlists? or should >> I get other means to make my filters? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> /Fredrik >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17 >> ------------------------------------------------------- > -- Mvh /Fredrik ------------------------------------------------------- KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17 -------------------------------------------------------