[irrtoolset]Making IRRToolSet compile...

Hi,

i had 4.8.1 compile on a x86 gentoo-linux 2.4.22 with gcc2.95.3, but 
peval produced a segmentation fault so i went back to 4.7.3 which works 
well.

The binary distributions (both 4.7.3 and 4.8.1) don't work on my system :-(

Cheers
Jan


Jon Lawrence wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 9:55 pm, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>me again.  Someone pointed me towards IRRToolSet which is a bit
>>newer than RAToolSet.  I'm trying to make IRRToolSet 4.8.1
>>compile on NetBSD 1.6 with gcc 2.95.3 and the libsdc++ which came
>>with that compiler.
>>
>>First off: it seems that almost all of the diffs I sent earlier
>>against RAToolSet still have to be applied to IRRToolSet.
>>
>>Second: how has anyone got IRRToolSet 4.8.1 to compile?!?  I have
>>to ask, because I get:
>>
>>c++ -c -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include
>>-I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../../Core 
>>prefix.cc prefix.cc: In method `void MPPrefixRanges::and(MPPrefixRanges
>>*)': prefix.cc:1147: implicit declaration of function `int assign(...)'
>>gmake[4]: *** [prefix.o] Error 1
>>gmake[4]: Leaving directory
>>`/usr/pkgsrc/net/IRRToolSet/work/IRRToolSet-4.8.1/src/rpsl/rpsl'
>>
>>...and implicit declarations in C++ are as far as I know fatal.
>>How can this compile at all on any other platform?
>>
>>Fixing this appears to require more C++ skills or familiarity
>>with the code than I have, so assistance on this point would be
>>much appreciated.
>>
> 
> I also haven't yet managed to get it to compile - I've just setup a debian 3.0 
> box so that I have a system with <gcc 3.x.x on which to play. The binary 
> version runs fine on the Debian box, which is good enough for my purposes at 
> present :)
> 
> Could someone post a system spec (software wise) that is known to work (for 
> compiling) - please include distro if possible.
> 
> Regards,
> Jon
> 

-- 
Jan Boogman / Swisscom IP-Plus AS3303 / Backbone Engineering / CCIE#7345