<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="en-BE" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">A measurement issue at Google is probably where to look (or some peering/routing with Google AS)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">-�ric<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:36.0pt">
<b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 10 October 2023 at 11:35<br>
<b>To: </b>Marco Davids (Private) <mdavids@forfun.net><br>
<b>Cc: </b>RIPE IPv6 WG <ipv6-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [ipv6-wg] Why did the Google IPv6 statistics dropped for the Netherlands?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Marco Davids (Private) via ipv6-wg wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hello,<br>
><br>
> Is there anyone in this group that would dare to speculate on the sudden drop <br>
> in IPv6 adoption for my country, the Netherlands on this URL?<br>
<br>
<a href="https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/NL">https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/NL</a> doesn't show equivalent drop.<br>
<br>
Last I heard presentation about how APNIC measures this, it's through <br>
Google ads served to web browsers, so that sounds like similar method to <br>
what google might be using.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit:
<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>