This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Schäfer
tschaefer at t-online.de
Sat May 27 10:45:18 CEST 2023
Hi, during the closing plenary were considerations to remove the IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) network/ssid the next time. I would vote for that. IPv6-mostly covers the traditional IPv6-only. Someone made the proposal to provide a real "ipv6 only" net/ssid instead (without nat64) My first thought was: Never, it will the people just frustrate. My second thought was: Let's try it! After the first shock - only 50% of the websites support IPv6 - we should provide tips for testing: - using public dns64 with own nat64 address space - VPN, the public ones like apple privacy relay, cloudflare warp ... - VPN, own organisation/company like eduvpn for NREN (e.g. DFN supports it, other institutes too, cisco anyconnect... -VPN personal, like wireguard/ipsec to AVMs fritzbox and others, openvpn NAS/ own setups Last but not least I propose to provide that special DNS-resolver: https://gitlab.com/miyurusankalpa/IPv6-dns-server It increases the amount of IPv6 capable destinations. Regards, Thomas
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]