This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] contents of ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 135, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Not standing as working group chair for another term
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] contents of ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 135, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clodagh Durkan
clodagh.durkan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 26 14:16:02 CEST 2023
Hi Wilhelm, all, I am also really interested in this topic, really suspect it’s not broken for the most enterprises so why invest into what’s a whole new re architecture, skills in-house may also not exist. expensive in people and technology and high risk migration. Gsma announced this year global IOT devices surpassed SIMs this year, both now at 2bn + so change is already coming from the networks. I would really like to contribute however I can, Clodagh.durkan at ucdconnect.ie or gmail above Best regards, Clodagh On Thu 15 Jun 2023 at 11:00, <ipv6-wg-request at ripe.net> wrote: > Send ipv6-wg mailing list submissions to > ipv6-wg at ripe.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ipv6-wg-request at ripe.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ipv6-wg-owner at ripe.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ipv6-wg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Clear Guidance for Enterprises (Paolo Volpato) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:08:22 +0000 > From: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato at huawei.com> > To: Wilhelm Boeddinghaus <wilhelm at boeddinghaus.de> > Cc: "ipv6-wg at ripe.net" <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises > Message-ID: <2164ac90f1b34e908d39fe008217be7c at huawei.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Wilhelm, All, > > I have noticed that some people would be happy to cooperate to your idea > of a paper for IPv6 in enterprises (me included :-) > Wonder if you have thought of any rough plan to start and organize the > work. > > Many thanks > Paolo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wilhelm Boeddinghaus <wilhelm at boeddinghaus.de> > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 4:20 PM > To: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato at huawei.com> > Cc: ipv6-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises > > Hi Paolo, > > thanks for your help with this project. > > Lack of budget is of course a problem. But if the IT departments could at > least quantify the budget, this would help. If they have no idea how to > start the project, a budget eastimation is not possible. > > Best, > > Wilhelm > > Am 31.05.2023 um 08:42 schrieb Paolo Volpato via ipv6-wg: > > Hi Wilhelm, > > > > In addition, I would add that they also lack the budget to consider > deploying IPv6, meaning that enterprises don't consider IPv6 as a priority. > > At least, this is what we found during the editing of RFC 9386 on IPv6 > deployment status. > > > > I would be happy to contribute to this effort. > > > > Best regards > > Paolo > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Wilhelm > > Boeddinghaus > > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 6:06 PM > > To: ipv6-wg at ripe.net > > Subject: [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises > > > > Hi, > > > > at the end of my talk during the RIPE86 IPv6 working group I promised to > start work on a paper with clear guidance for enterprises to migrate their > networks to IPv6. > > > > We have often wondere why enterprises do not migrate to IPv6. One > possible answer is: They have no time and they lack knowledge. Many IT > departments don't have any spare time for reading RFCs. > > > > From my understanding these IT departments don't need papers > explaining the many possibilites to choose from. They need very clear > guidance and examples. > > > > I am looking for 3 to 4 people who would like to start working on this > with me. > > > > Peter Hessler contacted me during the meeting and he offered his help, > time and expertise for this project. Thank you, Peter. > > > > Best, > > > > Wilhelm > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > > End of ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 135, Issue 10 > **************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20230626/9e641b87/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Not standing as working group chair for another term
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] contents of ipv6-wg Digest, Vol 135, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]