This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] "router cascade with DHCPv6-PD"
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "router cascade with DHCPv6-PD"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [Snac] [v6ops] "router cascade with DHCPv6-PD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Sun Jan 15 23:45:44 CET 2023
Timothy Winters <tim at qacafe.com> wrote: > Thanks for sending this along, one of things when I read this article was > the firewall not allowing PD traffic thru. I will be adding that was a > requirement to this draft. The other concept was that of PPPoE passthrough, which I was aware occured when the "first" router was some kind of closed IPTV appliance. I have seen a device that does PPPoE passthrough *and* also provides service on the "LAN" I think, back in 1995, that the telcos originally had the notion that every desktop would do PPP with them :-) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 515 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20230115/ca79f215/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "router cascade with DHCPv6-PD"
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [Snac] [v6ops] "router cascade with DHCPv6-PD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]