This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - Go6
jan at go6.si
Thu Nov 25 21:01:22 CET 2021
On 25/11/2021 16:20, Tim Chown wrote: >> On 25 Nov 2021, at 14:57, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 6:46 AM Tim Chown <Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> It’s in 4.4 (routers and L3 switches). Does it need to be in 4.1, Hosts? >> >> I'd like it to be available everywhere. :) > > Well, perhaps the first step here is the mention of AQM for L3 switches and routers. > > It sounds like CPEs too, before hosts. I thought that in RIPE554 (and -bis) we are defining IPv6 requrements :) I would suggest to limit this particular discussion in just refreshing RIPE554, reach the consensus, publish it, open a champagne, celebrate and next morning start working on expanded version where we can discuss all the suggestions for new types of "devices" and all this new additions. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Latest draft for RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]