This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vasilenko Eduard
vasilenko.eduard at huawei.com
Fri Dec 24 09:03:55 CET 2021
Hi Nico, I agree that ordinary subscribers would probably not request Internet redundancy. Hence, no need for PI. But just small businesses could drive the Internet table well beyond what is possible for hardware in this century. Unfortunately, Nobody is interested in the 3rd alternative: to fix current protocols (primarily ND and Source Address Selection on the host) to support PAs from many Carriers at the same time. Eduard -----Original Message----- From: Nico Schottelius [mailto:nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch] Sent: Friday, December 24, 2021 12:20 AM To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard at huawei.com> Cc: Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org>; Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch>; Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net>; ipv6-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83) Hey Eduard, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard at huawei.com> writes: > There is a much bigger problem than the hassle with RIPE formalities and fees. > It is the size of the Internet table. While the size of the global table is a concern, using it as an argument for reducing access to global IPv6 addresses feels wrong to me. For the sake of the routing table, it would be best if only a handful of companies are in the Internet, the best would be very centralised Internet at a single location. >From my perspective, this is the opposite of how the Internet is supposed to work - in a robust and decentralised fashion. Keeping the global routing table manageable is a valid concern, but I don't think it's a good argument for preventing organisations to get their own /48 and connect to the Internet. Aside from that, it is probably not realistic that billions of users are opting in for getting a) their unique address space and b) getting and connected to the global Internet. Best regards, Nico -- Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Free GUA space for community projects [CfP/RFC] (was: Minutes from the IPv6 WG @ RIPE 83)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]