This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Rquirements for VPN
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Rquirements for VPN
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ip address pricing and protocol selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Thu Oct 29 16:08:50 CET 2020
On 29/10/20 05:55, Thomas Schäfer wrote: > > > Am 28.10.20 um 22:09 schrieb christian bretterhofer: >> After reading >> https://go6.si/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RIPE554-bis-v_01.pdf >> I see VPNs as part of the Network Security Equipment. >> But in my opinium there is not enough definition to be a VPN quality >> criteria. > >> >> Protocols with DNS64/NAT64 support would also help. >> maybe it fist into this recommendation document. > > I think that is already covered by > VPN external Protocol Must support IPv6 clients to IPv6 servers (6-to-6) > ( Ipv6 Only) > and > VPN inner Protocol Must support IPv6 clients to IPv6 servers (6-to-6) > > > Maybe it should be mentioned the every day problems called > > "... leaks" FWIW, if you need a ref: RFC7359 Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Rquirements for VPN
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ip address pricing and protocol selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]