This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Thu Oct 29 07:08:20 CET 2020
Hi, Tim, On 28/10/20 14:18, Tim Chown via ipv6-wg wrote: > Hi, > > I’m posting here as a heads-up that an effort has begun to revise RIPE-554, involving the original authors, myself and Tim Winters. We have a 5 min slot tomorrow in the 1pm CET IPv6 WG session to flag the work, to solicit input. > > The original publication was back in November 2010 with RIPE-501, which was updated in June 2012 with RIPE-554. > > There’s many references that have been obsoleted, and potentially much to add or remove. References to 2G cellular date the document. > > We’d like to begin by addressing the more strategic / structural questions. Such high level questions include: > > - Is there agreement to progress a –bis version now? Eight years have passed, people ask for guidance… I personally think this would be a good idea. > - Should we keep the scope to (largely) enterprise or expand it? If so, to what? FWIW, I would keep the scope of this document, and span other efforts if necessary (divide and conquer). > - Is the linkage to the IPv6 Ready Logo programme still desired? IMO, probably not. > - Are there new classes of equipment to add, e.g. IoT/low power, WiFi controllers, …? I'd probably update the current work and, if necessary, then span other efforts. -- the current docs are dated, and it's probably better to focus on bringing them up to date in a timely manner, than to open the door to all sorts of stuff which might take way more time to finish. > - Are specific sections outdated, or are there significant new sections to add? > - Should we add guidance on applying the content to different use cases? As separate docs? Appendices? I will review the doc and come back with comments. Thanks! Regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]