[ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only

On Fri, 29 May 2020, Philip Homburg wrote:

>> That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only
>> services.
>
> (I'm assuming that IPv6 only meens a service that is reachable only over IPv6
> and not IPv4)
>
> I don't see why promoting communication failures is a good thing. Except
> possibly as a fun thing to nudge people to take action. For example a
> quiz with prizes could be hosted on an IPv6-only platform.
>
>> And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which
>> lack features in IPv6 only environments.
>
> I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that
> lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with
> replacements that do support them.
>
> Such a list may have two advantages:
> 1) Somebody who likes to promote IPv6 would not have to spend time looking
>   for good alternatives to known brands
> 2) Being on a list of backward companies is bad pr for any company, so it
>   may stimulate companies to get off the wrong part of the list.


ipv6shamelist.org seems to be available :-)


Cheers,
Carlos