[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:46:16PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
> Maybe there is another question this working group can answer:
> Does this working group recommend wifi deployments as NAT64? (of course 
> only NAT64, not paired with dual stack on another SSID)
> - Is it recommended for a coffee shop or restaurant
> - Is it recommended for an office lan,
> - for a home situation
> - for just a random conference?

Given that doing dual-stack anywhere is "dual work", my recommendation
for anything that needs proper monitoring would be "go single-stack if
all possible".

Which nowadays for "random visitor networks" can mean "NAT64+DNS64",
given that this already nicely works in mobile networks and more and
more "mobile internet usage" stuff is "iOS/Android clients or all-https" 
anyway.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191011/efc98ac2/attachment.sig>