This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Schäfer
thomas at cis.uni-muenchen.de
Wed Oct 9 10:41:03 CEST 2019
Am 08.10.19 um 18:14 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker: > On the other hand, switching the "default" meeting SSID to IPv6-only/NAT64 > while still providing the dual stack network as a fallback, preferably > combined with a helpdesk staffed by volunteers ready to analyze any > problems that attendees might have, strikes me as a pretty good opportunity > to raise awareness and to find problems where further work is needed. I would be a volunteer at ripe80, provided the DNS64/NAT64-Gateway isn't overbooked. That should be easy to ask 10 people. (the other 890 will not have problems at all) Do you want to investigate the problem? Do you want just switch to the classic network? Nobody will be without network and "we" would get an overview, where the problems are. Regards, Thomas -- There’s no place like ::1 Thomas Schäfer (Systemverwaltung) Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Centrum für Informations- und Sprachverarbeitung Oettingenstraße 67 Raum C109 80538 München ☎ +49/89/2180-9706 ℻ +49/89/2180-9701
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]