This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Philip Homburg pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com
Tue Oct 8 13:15:07 CEST 2019

In your letter dated Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:56:15 +0200 you wrote:
>In the Netherlands, there is no mobile operator providing IPv6 
>connectivity. None! I cannot get IPv6 on my mobile connection!

KPN announced last week (September 30) that they started providing
mobile customers with IPv6. They seem quite careful, so it may take a while
before they enable it everywhere.

>Also, in the Netherlands, the one Internet-to-home provider providing 
>dual-stack IPv6 (w/o NAT mess) is being assimilated by it's parent who, 
>after twenty-five years, is still technologically behind and can't 
>deliver IPv6 themselves.

As far as I know, KPN does have some IPv6 on DSL. Both Ziggo and KPN
provide IPv6 with some sort of carrier grade NAT for IPv4. But it should be
easy enough to obtain real IPv4 elsewhere...

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]