This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Mon Oct 7 21:57:34 CEST 2019
Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> writes: Dave, > If I can get *one* person in this working group to go down to their > local coffee shop and make ipv6 work by whatever means necessary (and > also fix their bufferbloat) - I'll consider my participation in this > thread a success. you have to be strong now. Your participation in this list is not a success. I know at least two places I'd count as coffee shop (besides coffee they also server real breakfast, lunch, dinner, cocktails, ...) who I don't need to convince to do IPv6. They just do it. I get a RFC1918 address and a global IPv6 address. And they don't mangle DNS, they don't have any strange portal where you have to accept an unknown usage policy. You just sit down, connect to the wireless and can work. One of those stores is just a couple of hundred meters from my current hotel so I consider it "local". And as they have around 90 franchise partners in Germany probably there are more then two offer 2 shops offering this service. Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]