This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bjoern Buerger b.buerger at penguin.de
Mon Oct 7 15:57:43 CEST 2019

* Mikael Abrahamsson (swmike at swm.pp.se) [191007 12:45]:
> On Android/iOS I'd say it's production ready. 

Yes.

> On classic desktop OSes like MacOS, Windows and Linux it's not.
> The difference is the presence of widely available 464XLAT support.

>From my observation, that's correct.

Theoretically, there may be better solutions, but 464XLAT 
ist just fine and does the job. 

Bjørn 

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]