[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

> Kai 'wusel' Siering
> Rationale: an internal network needing more than 16 million IPv4 addresses (10/8) does have the power to solve their
> addressing needs with IPv6. This isn't true for newcomers that have to deal with old players not enabling v6.

I do not agree because it does not fit my use-case, but this is the best argument I have heard for many years.

Keep in mind though : your idea is great, but it has been tried many times, for more than a decade, including by people who are respected players, big shots, and have serious clout, and it has repeatedly failed. What makes you think that you can make it work ? Everyone has tried, everyone has failed. Multiple times.

I must have missed what news you have about it.

Michel.