This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Sun Oct 6 13:30:41 CEST 2019
Michel Py wrote on 06/10/2019 00:53: > The war is global. Who do you think you are to tell me to take it > somewhere else ? > The chair of a mighty WG that has managed, in 20 years, to capture a > whole 2.5% of the Internet traffic right in your own backyard at > AMS-IX ? > > Kick me out of the mailing list, if you have the power to do so. Michel, It's not fully clear what points you're trying to make here. Is it that the RIPE Address Policy working group is responsible for global ipv6 adoption? Or that Sander is personally responsible for AMS-IX member IPv6 adoption policy? Or that Sander has any interest other than constructive discussion on RIPE working group mailing lists? This looks like a personal attack on Sander. This brings down the tone of the WG mailing lists and is terribly unnecessary. Please take this elsewhere. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]