This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Enno Rey erey at ernw.de
Sun Oct 6 00:43:39 CEST 2019

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 12:38:14AM +0200, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote:
> 
> > Net result : organizations that need more than 10/8 are now (and they are plenty of examples) squatting un-announced DoD space such as 30/8.
> 
> Maybe someone should tell them about IPv6 then.

or about the rumours that the DoD has been encouraged to make some of its address space available to ARIN ;-)

cheers

Enno


-- 
Enno Rey

@Enno_Insinuator

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]