This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Sat Oct 5 22:10:21 CEST 2019
Thus wrote Michel Py (michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us): > Time to be nice has come, and gone. The IPv6 camp has clearly stated that their goal is to win the war. Battle time. What theatralics. I want a 'net where I can do end-to-end, and where new things can happen. That can't be done with IPv4 (only) because v4 doesn't have sufficient addresses for this world. If some people want to stay IPv4-only forever: sure, if that makes you happy, just don't expect the rest of the world to hobble themselves so you won't miss out. Regarding your "I will blacklist your resume": you greatly overestimate your relevance. When I started networking the money was with OSI. The money did not win. Companies make bad decisions and fail. regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]