This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Anton Rieger inrin at jikken.de
Sat Oct 5 20:59:39 CEST 2019

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:10:31PM +0200, Jens Link wrote:
>> In the IPv4 net many are scattered (right now)
>
>This is good from a security perspective. Confuses the attacker!

Hope the exclamation mark is a ⸮(irony sign) here.
All prefixes are public and many tools exist to gather them.
For example bgp.he.net.
Security through obscurity should not be an pro or contra argument ;)

Anton

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]