[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 05:06:57PM +0000, Michel Py wrote:
> > Gert Doering wrote :
> > It's not "private address space" unless designated as such.
> 
> Wrong again. It's not public unless given to RIRs to allocate it.
> FUD++

Uh, no.  The IETF decides what it is, and if they say it's private
(like they did with RFC1918), then it is.

If they say it's "reserved", it's not up for grabs (neither for the RIRs
not for any private deployment either).

"Not RIR space" does not make it "private", there are at least 3 different
states.

Before calling FUD on others, please get your facts straight.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191005/cdb4f710/attachment.sig>