[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 04:13:48PM +0000, Michel Py wrote:
> > Nick Hilliard wrote :
> > The cost of making 240/4 usable is to update every device on the planet,
> > including legacy ipv4 stacks.
> 
> No it is not. It costs nothing to the Internet, it only costs to those who chose to use it as private address space.
> More FUD.

It's not "private address space" unless designated as such.

But yeah, if only used internally, you just need to upgrade all those
OS/2, Win95, WinXP systems, old internal routers, ... :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191005/f49db18f/attachment.sig>