This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Sat Oct 5 10:51:16 CEST 2019
Hi, Thus wrote Bjoern Buerger (b.buerger at penguin.de): > Am Fri, 04 Oct 2019 schrieb Tim Chown: > > a) deploy IPv6 where it makes sense for you to do so. > a) deploy IPv6 everywhere. Otherwise you are not reaching > the whole internet. For a sufficient number of networks that is a feature, not a bug. Not every net aspires to be Internet :) regards, spz
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]