[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Michel,

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:23:55AM +0000, Michel Py wrote:
> > Wolfgang Zenker wrote :
> > ... the results of the RIPE NCC survey published today lists the scarcity of IPv4
> > addresses as one of the largest challenges facing the participants in the survey.
> 
> The participants in the RIPE NCC survey are not representative of the market.
> Here in the USA we have 

... an IPv6 deployment rate of > 50%, see https://twitter.com/Enno_Insinuator/status/1179974955502428161.

> We are in the end of 2019, I live and work in California, and my ISP does not offer IPv6.

That is, in all seriousness, regrettable. I live and work in California, too, not far away from Sacramento.
My ISP brings IPv6 to my home, I have it on my phones and I hear that the companies of people I meet over lunch serve terabytes of data over IPv6 every single day. It seems California is a quite diverse place, in many regards...

> Your ideas are technically flawed, that being said. And you are not taking it to the right place.
> Try the IETF.

that was funny. I mean both sentences are heavily flawed but at least the second gave me a good laugh.

cheers

Enno