This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk
Thu Oct 3 17:11:02 CEST 2019
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 16:02, Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote: > > Tim Chown <Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk> writes: > >> (Surprised we’re having this conversation in 2019, as the final fumes of >> IPv4 address space disappear from Europe…) > > If you had told me 10 or even 5 years ago that I would be having the > conversation in 2019 I would have laughed at you. Now it's a very sad > situation. IPv4 has won. > > I had a discussion over lunch about v6 yesterday (which is part of the > reason I started this today) and all I heard "but that is different > then IPv4. I don't like this!" There will always be a legacy tail. The dinosaurs can wallow in their swamp. Those who deploy v6 will benefit from it. Others will feel the heat of not moving; here in the UK it’s Sky and BT who have between them ~10M households on IPv6. That’s not failure. New communities will benefit. For example, the largest science experiments are now migrating to IPv6, e.g., CERN and WLCG is 70% there, SKA will use it. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]