[ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel

On 5/25/18 4:41 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> No, the text above, where the names of he organisations are in a footnote, implies precisely that ITU should *not* develop their own things but instead cooperate so that what is developed in other SDOs matches whatever needs ITU believes exists. Without the text, RIPE would never have got the liaison in the first place.

hi,

you clearly say it implies that, ok. i'm just stressing the fact that in
this wg it's worthless arguing about ITU's manners as a further argument
in favor of the lack of technical quality of the paper.

let's stick to the tech issues.

thank you
--
antonio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20180525/348e886e/attachment.sig>