[ipv6-wg] comments on Y.Pv6RefModel

Hi,
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 10:07:13 +0100
> From: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>
>[...] 
> 3) It?s unacceptable for the ITU to even attempt to get involved in IP addressing. It?s out of scope. They should stick to co-ordination of E.164 numbers and X.25 addresses. IP addressing is primarily a matter for the RIRs. And other Internet-related fora like RIPE, NANOG, IETF, etc. There?s no role for the ITU in this at all.

maybe a coordonnated letter from NRO (or ICANN), ISOC which explained
*diplomatically* that IP addressing is a matter of RIRs :)


-- 
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20180525/4e64e3ff/attachment.sig>