This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6 Adoption Statistics: How do APNIC and Facebook Compare?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Spam Over IPv6 - Eight Years Later

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Jun 15 23:42:55 CEST 2018

* Jetten Raymond:

> As it is quite big, the text of this draft Recommendation
> Y.IPv6RefModel "Reference model of IPv6 subnet addressing plan for
> Internet of things deployment" has been made available on the IPv6 WG
> pages:

> https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/ipv6/documents/itu-ipv6refmodel

I think this looks at the problem from literally the wrong end.  Even
under the most restrictive assignment regimes, end users still have 64
address bits to play with, and each address resulting in a globally
unique address.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6 Adoption Statistics: How do APNIC and Facebook Compare?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Spam Over IPv6 - Eight Years Later

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]