This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Looking for a secon opinion on using ULA along with GUA for residential access

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6 Address Planning in GavleNet
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6-only? IPv4-as-a-service?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yannis Nikolopoulos dez at otenet.gr
Wed Nov 1 16:37:20 CET 2017

On 10/31/2017 01:00 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
>  From my point of view, if ULA is enabled:
>   - it allows the client's LAN to stay IPv6-enabled even when the
>   internet connection is down. It is a simpler version compared to the
>   use of link-locals.

for me, it's just the point above. It's nice to have.
regards,
Yannis

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6 Address Planning in GavleNet
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] New on RIPE Labs: IPv6-only? IPv4-as-a-service?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]