[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Dear RIPE IPv6 WG,

As promised at last RIPE meeting in Madrid, we produced a first draft of
"Best Current Operational Practice for operators: IPv6 prefix assignment
for end-users - static (stable) or dynamic (non-stable) and what size to
choose."

The aim of this document is to document the best current operational
practice on what size of IPv6 prefix ISPs should assign/delegate to
their customers and should they delegate it in a stable, static way or
should it change over time.

Please find the PDF attached and also accessible at:

https://www.sinog.si/docs/draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v1.pdf

We are submitting this document to RIPE IPv6 WG (here) to check the
technical validity of the document and also get consensus on it. We are
also submitting it to RIPE BCOP TF to check if this is a
real best operational practice and get consensus on it there.

Please, read the document and send back comments to this mailing list.
All feedback is more than welcome.

On behalf of co-authors, Jan Žorž

P.S: This document is not intended to document what practices may
be in future and what they might look like, but to reflect the best
methods of implementing IPv6 at the time of publication. Updates to this
document will be published to reflect changes in best current practices
where there are developments in standards and implementations.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 118935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20170327/aa41194f/attachment.pdf>