[ipv6-wg] IPv6 Prefix delegation BCOP version 3 is out...

On 27/07/2017 17:58, Rob Evans wrote:
> This highlighted something for me…
> 
>>> If we decide to use /127 for each point to point link, then it is
>>> also advisable to allocate a /64 for each link and use just one
>>> /127 out of it to prevent the Neighbor Discovery exhaustion
>>> attack (RFC6583).
> 
> The document could do with a pass by a good copy-editor (“we” is
> probably not the right language for a BCP).  Is that something ISOC
> could arrange if you’re facilitating the BCOPs? :-)

Hey,

Thnx for this comment. Usually (RIPE-501, 554, 631) RIPE NCC staff does
the language check and fine-tunes the grammar before publishing the
document (and we are more than grateful for that ;) )

I hope that this will be true also in this case...

Cheers and thnx, Jan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3976 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20170727/a9b9b686/attachment.p7s>