This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IMPORTANT: RIPE75 is SPECIAL (call for presentations)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IMPORTANT: RIPE75 is SPECIAL (call for presentations)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IMPORTANT: RIPE75 is SPECIAL (call for presentations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 4 03:28:45 CEST 2017
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont at si6networks.com> wrote: [WG chairs hat OFF] > Just out of curiosity: Why should a remote presenter provide a passport? Whatever I say will be just a guess, how can I speak for the UAE government? My guess would be that they want to make sure that remote presenters are not using pseudonyms. What if I submit a remote presentation as Fernando Gont and start advocating inserting Ipv6 extension headers on the fly, for example? ;))) > That seems to me like a weird requirement to me, and possibly even hard > to enforce (unless there's someone watching a video stream and checking > if they have a copy of the passport for that person?). And, if the > person is not traveling anyway, he/she might not even have a passport in > the first place. I'd expect that some other form of government-issued ID would do - but again, I'm speculating. > (yes, I understand you're just the messenger :-) ) Thanks, highly appreciated ;) -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IMPORTANT: RIPE75 is SPECIAL (call for presentations)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IMPORTANT: RIPE75 is SPECIAL (call for presentations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]