[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Hi Yanis, All,


On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> Hi Yanis,
>
> That sounds surprising, but in any case, a few weeks ago, a new policy 
> proposal to facilitate this has been approved. I think is already 
> implemented or it will a matter of a few days, so you should not have 
> any problem at all to justify an allocation for 1.6 millions of 
> customers or even much more, with a /48.

i.e. this message....... (if the estimation was correct, the announcement 
will happen very soon!)

===========================
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:04:06
From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net>
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 Proposal Accepted (Synchronising the 
Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies)

Dear colleagues,

Consensus has been reached on 2016-05,
"Synchronising the Initial and Subsequent IPv6 Allocation Policies".

This policy change matches the subsequent IPv6 allocation requirements
with the initial allocation requirements. In addition to the existing
justification based on past utilisation, it is now also possible to
document new needs, including the number of users, the extent of the 
organisation's
infrastructure, the hierarchical and geographical structuring of
the organisation, the segmentation of infrastructure for security and
the planned longevity of the allocation.

You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-05

The new RIPE Document is ripe-684 and is available at:
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-684

We estimate that this proposal will take around two weeks to fully 
implement.

We will send another announcement once the implementation is complete
and the new procedures are in place.

Thank you to everyone who provided input.

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC
===========================


Cheers,
Carlos



> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Yannis Nikolopoulos <dez at otenet.gr>
> Responder a: <dez at otenet.gr>
> Fecha: martes, 11 de abril de 2017, 11:24
> Para: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
> CC: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan at go6.si>, "ipv6-wg at ripe.net" <ipv6-wg at ripe.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
>
>    On 04/11/2017 11:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>    > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
>    >
>    >> 3.2.2: /48 for all is most practical & most pragmatic? How many /32 we
>    >> need to burn for our end users? We have ~1.6M residential users and
>    >> our /29 is definitely not enough. Is RIPE onboard with that?
>    >
>    > Yes. /48 per site is ok as per all IETF and RIPE documents I am aware of.
>    >
>    > So if your /29 is too small for your customer base, go get another one.
>    > I know ISPs who returned their /29 before they even started serious
>    > deployment, and received larger space. I encourage people to do just this.
>    >
>
>    That's great to hear but when we upgraded our /32 to a /29 (~2011), this
>    was not the case unfortunately (meaning that RIPE would not accept our
>    long term addressing plan as a reason enough to get multiple /29s
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
>