This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Apr 11 18:13:03 CEST 2017

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017, at 10:53, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
> > 3.2.1: which mechanisms use a default /48 prefix size? Could you please
> > elaborate a bit?
> 
> That was some tunneling mechanisms, Jordi can explore more. I would just
> remove that section, but Jordi wants to elaborate on this ;)

Years ago I had to deal a little bit with Microsoft DirectAccess which
was expecting /48, no more, no less.
Not sure about the status today.
--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]