[ipv6-wg] Happy Eyeballs bias

> On 26 Oct 2016, at 17:43, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Philip Homburg
> <pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
>> I wonder, if a host has a global IPv6 address that is not derived from any
>> kind of transition technology or tunnel, and setting up a TCP connection is
>> either slow or fails, then what percentage is due to an issue close to the
>> host and what percentage close to the target.
>> 
>> I.e., if IPv6 is broken is there any reason to believe it is often enough
>> due to ISP provided services that is would be worth reporting it in a
>> roudabout way.
> 
> I'd say that it is much more likely to be broken close to clients, at
> least for Alexa web sites..

We cannot generalise this without empirical data.

There is also v6 brokenness (or slowness) in ALEXA websites also 
that not hosted by large CDNs. 

-- Vaibhav

===================================
Vaibhav Bajpai
www.vaibhavbajpai.com

Postdoctoral Researcher
Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
===================================