This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bajpai, Vaibhav v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de
Mon May 23 14:39:52 CEST 2016

> On 23 May 2016, at 14:29, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> furry at Wintermute:~>dig dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de aaaa +short
> 2001:638:709:3000::3a
> furry at Wintermute:~>telnet -6 dragon.eecs.jacobs-university.de 5000
> Trying 2001:638:709:3000::3a...
> telnet: connect to address 2001:638:709:3000::3a: Connection refused
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
> 
> That host does have IPv6 address in DNS (so no NAT64 is involved) but
> nothing is listening on tcp/5000 on that IPv6 address.

Fixed. Now it’s listening on both v4 and v6.

> -- 
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

Best, Vaibhav

===================================
Vaibhav Bajpai
www.vaibhavbajpai.com

Room 91, Research I
School of Engineering and Sciences
Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
===================================

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] v4 versus v6 -- who connects faster?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]