This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu May 19 10:29:47 CEST 2016
Hi, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:19:07AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > My opinion is that anything between /56 and /48 is fine. As far as I know, > current RIPE policy gives the ISP the option to without motivation, ask > for enough IPv6 addresses to offer each customer a /48 and I'd like to > keep it that way. Right. The reason why the address policy isn't fixed at "customer = /48" anymore is because Geoff Huston did some math, "back then", and came to the conclusion that IPv6 might actually be not sufficiently large if - every residential customer receives one or more /48s (multiple ISPs) - RIR->LIR policy has very liberal HD ratio (so for large blocks you get 1:10000 or worse utilization ration) - every human on earth gets access to the Internet so the policy was changed to make this a local decision, and sort of recommend a /56 (but /48 is OK, and counted as "256 customers with /56" when judging utilization) (and tightened HD ratio somewhat). With-no-hats, I think a /56 for residential is good enough, especially with homenet coming to replace the old DHCP-PD hierarchical model where you could end up with prefix shortage if you have router cascades, due to protocol inflexibility ("/56 router delegating /60 -> delegating /64 and then?"). With homenet, 250 subnets in the home would "just work" given a /56, and I'm too narrow-minded to imagine deployments that need more *subnets*. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160519/5c7bd3a4/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]