[ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?

Perhaps you could also include some more columns about the devices/softwares used to deliver IPv6:
-CPE (ie: SLAAC, DHCPv6, DS-Lite, etc…)
-core network (ie: Cisco ASR1000 NAT64 feature, etc…)
-software (ie: PowerDNS for DNS64, etc…)

I agree it’s sometimes sensible information as it may be the outcome of a long and painful work but some people may be willing to share that as it would promote those vendors and those specific softwares and it could send a message to those who are late in the game.

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr <mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr>
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26
www.ipeva.fr <blocked::http://www.ipeva.fr/>  -   www.ipeva-studio.com <blocked::http://www.ipeva-studio.com/>

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.




> Le 19 mai 2016 à 09:18, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Colin, Marco,
> 
> Very good points. I think to make it easy, I’m going to create an online survey, not sure if today or tomorrow, I will have the time to make it.
> 
> I will post the link on the list.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at marcoh.net>
> Responder a: <marcoh at marcoh.net>
> Fecha: jueves, 19 de mayo de 2016, 7:40
> Para: Colin Petrie <colin at spakka.net>
> CC: <ipv6-wg at ripe.net>
> Asunto: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 residential service: What prefix, static, dynamic, extra cost ?
> 
>>> Hi Jordi,
>>> 
>>> That could be a useful list to have somewhere, thanks for that.
>>> 
>>>> On 19 May 2016, at 00:22, Colin Petrie <colin at spakka.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 18/05/16 20:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>>>>> So here are the questions for actual IPv6 services providers to residential customers:
>>>>> 1) What prefix size is provided?
>>>>> 2) Is that prefix static or dynamic?
>>>>> 3) In case is dynamic, there is a chance for static?
>>>>> 4) Any extra cost for having it static, or having a bigger prefix (i.e., /48 instead of /56)?
>>>>> 5) If the customer has already a static IPv4 with a monthly charge, is still IPv6 static prefix being charged on top of that?
>>>> 
>>>> A related question that is not on the list above:
>>>> 6) Can the customer delegate reverse DNS for the assigned IPv6 prefix?
>>>> 6a) If the prefix is static, can they use an NS delegation?
>>>> 6b) If the prefix is dynamic, can they consistently DNAME it to a
>>>> customer-hosted zone that contains PTRs for 'some-subnet-size'?
>>>> 
>>>> Of course, most residential customers probably don't care. But I mention
>>>> it as both a DNS and IPv6 geek. It's something to consider.
>>> 
>>> Would it be a lot of work to add 2 or 3 columns regarding the IPv4 support?
>>> 
>>> 7) Do you still provide native IPv4 support?
>>> 7a) globally routable address? yes/no, static/dynamic?
>>> 7b) NAT444 (CGN) or DS-lite
>>> 7c) NAT64 or 464-Xlat
>> 
>> Still early, sorry for the reply to self.
>> 
>> Maybe it is useful if it is organised based on type of network: wireless/wireline and/or carrier (cable, DSL, wifi, GSM). There might be differences in type of service based on the carrier.
>> 
>> Marco
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ***********************************************************************************************************
> Le service MailSecure d'IPeva confirme l'absence de virus et de spam dans ce message.
> ***********************************************************************************************************
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160519/5f24d2f8/attachment.html>