This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Jun 16 07:30:02 CEST 2016

On 15/Jun/16 19:56, Aled Morris wrote:

>
>
> It would also allow providers to deploy IPv6 without having to have
> native IPv6 connectivity from their upstreams - as a dynamic tunnel
> protocol, LISP is better than a single tunnel to HE or whatever.

Perhaps, but I'd also not want to encourage a lack of interest in native
IPv6.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160616/8d492a53/attachment.html>

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]