This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Paul Hoogsteder mailings at meanie.nl
Tue Jun 14 18:23:23 CEST 2016

On 14-06-16 15:50, Antonio Prado wrote:
> On 6/13/16 10:47 PM, Paul Hoogsteder wrote:
>> yes - but do remember that RIPE has allocated smaller blocks up to /29
>> in certain corners of the IPv4 space:
> it does make no difference when filtering out >24bit at bgp borders
> --
> antonio
>
>
If you filter all of IPv4 at /24 then you can't reach certain 
destinations, so don't do that... It's easy to make exceptions up to /29 
for the three /8 where these small announcements come from.

Paul.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]