This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Antonio Prado aprado at topnet.it
Thu Mar 26 15:26:58 CET 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/26/15 2:31 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> By that logic probes with just RFC-1918 IPs should not attempt any 
> IPv4 measurements either.

roman,

I don't compare v6 to v4.
atlas should deal with ipv4 (nat44) in a different manner than ipv6
(nat66)

- --
antonio

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAlUUFzIACgkQuwElOCdao3/ttgCfVEIH6hIJX/lCR0+cIbQpncSA
8VYAnjaMsr47z+/qEMp/WW9d20SLWo0K
=St9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]