This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Thu Mar 26 10:23:23 CET 2015
Hi, > On 26 Mar 2015, at 08:26, Benedikt Stockebrand <bs at stepladder-it.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> writes: > >>> So the question to the community, should RIPE Atlas treat ULAs in the >>> same way as RFC-1918, addresses that should be ignored unless a valid >>> global address can be found elsewhere. Or should we keep the current >>> approach where ULAs are treated just like other global IPv6 addresses >>> and consider the probe host's network setup to be broken? >> >> But wait, if a probe has RFC1918 addresses only you do not mark it as >> 'no v4 connectivity', right? >> If a probe has a address of a global scope (v4 or v6) but could not >> reach the outside world it means the connectivity is broken. So IMHO >> it makes slightly more sense to mark ULA-only probes as having broken >> connectivity. > > just wondering: If I use RFC1918 addresses with IPv4 I might still have > Internet access through a NAT gateway. If I have only ULA, then I may > reasonably expect there's no NAT, so there's a fundamental difference > here. > > However, I personally *do* run my stuff through a firewall setup > including application level gateways. So it might be argued that my > ULA-only devices still have (some rather limited sort of) Internet > access anyway. It would seem this is a good platform from which to see what types of connectivity devices with ULAs have, e.g. to get a guesstimate of NPTv6 deployment. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [atlas] What to do with RIPE Atlas probes that have only a ULA as IPv6 address?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]