This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Thu Aug 13 12:46:48 CEST 2015
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:55:04 +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Niall, [...] > > I have run software teams that used chat rooms for discussion, even > with the developers scattered across 5 or 6 time zones. Our rule was > that any "official" discussions happened on-list and all decisions were > made there, I think such a rule needs to be very clearly understood. I didn't see anything like this in Daniel's start-of-thread message. Since then, he has clarified what he has in mind. On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:17:10 +0100, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: > > As Im saying in the other lists, im not talking about replacing the > list, just complementing it. Good. On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:55:04 +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > but it was often handy to be able to talk to people in real > time. So it is possible to add chat rooms to the mix while still > keeping a single place for official discussions. > > I'm not a strong advocate for IRC or any real-time technology for the > IPv6 working group, but I also don't see any reason to be opposed to it. I'm reassured. Thanks. ATB, Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]