This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Thu Aug 13 07:10:55 CEST 2015
Hi Benedict, WG, Thus wrote Benedikt Stockebrand (bs at stepladder-it.com): [...] > If we have this IRC channel, and if it turns out that decicion-related > discussions start to move there, then *somebody* *must* be there to send > them in the proper direction, i.e. to the mailing list. And again, that > can't possibly be the job of a WG chair. > > In other words, we need somebody to step forward and take on that duty. Unrealistic. Even if you had someone whose job it was to monitor the channel, they can hardly be expected to be even awake 24x7. >From my experience with other organisations that work through mailing lists and also have chat venues, treating the chat(s) as equivalent to "we were chatting over dinner", i.e. as slightly more refined discussion starts on the binding communication channel, is the only thing that works. [...] > If we establish that IRC channel, then we must find a way---and the > resources---to ensure this. Eh, preventing people from talking to each other is hard, especially if they all have Internet. :) (Never mind the occasional barbeque) regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]