This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Wed Aug 12 17:17:10 CEST 2015
Hi, As Im saying in the other lists, im not talking about replacing the list, just complementing it. Everything that already is done in the list, will be done on the list. But there are things (like discussing this) that can happen in a more real time discussions and if after that, something comes up then is mailed here. I think my point is very clear and everybody is missunderstanding it but since english is not my best, maybe Im not clear enough as I thought :( El 12/08/2015 a las 17:09, Sebastian Wiesinger escribió: > * Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> [2015-08-12 16:03]: >>> What do you think? >> >> I agree with what Jim Reid posted on another list in response to the >> same question. >> >> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2015-August/010523.html >> >> Specifically: "Put bluntly, if a discussion about any WG matter does >> not take place on the mailing list, it simply didn't happen." > > I agree. When you have something that concerns the WG it should happen > on the mailinglist, especially if you want input from other > participants. I am on IRC but I'm not reading the channel(s) all the > time. > > > Regards > > Sebastian >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]