This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Edoardo Martelli
em.mlist at gmail.com
Mon May 19 14:41:59 CEST 2014
Hi > a) there might be others Thanks. I thought of volunteering as well, but it took me some time to get the support of my management. Quickly there was a good team of candidates, and I decided to drop the matter. Thanks to your email, but still with a feeling of uncertainty, I'm now sending my application. About myself: I may not be well know to the RIPE community, but I've attended RIPE meetings regularly once per year since RIPE39. I worked for an Italian then European ISP for several years, until the burst of the bubble pushed me to CERN; I've been working in the Network Engineering team since. I've supervised the IPv6 deployment at CERN that I presented last week; I'm involved in the working group that is pushing IPv6 adoption in the High Energy Physics community. My organisation was one of the founder of RIPE and hosted several of the first meetings. It's an LIR, serving few international organizations in the Geneva area. It hosts a RIS server (04), an Atlas Anchor and few probes, a K-root instance. > First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end? I agree three people can make an effective and resilient team Edoardo
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]