[ipv6-wg] Vacancy - nominations can go here

Please wait a bit :)

a) there might be others
b) as much as we don’t like overhead, let’s come up with some procedure
c) I need to have a chat with Shane on exactly how we are going to do this

I had several people including one of the candidates asking for a soft landing, where Shane and I gradually remove ourselves out of this, rather than just running off. So at a minimum we need to fix this in terms of timelines.

Also it is not a given that there must be three, I think 4 is too many and you definitely need 2 for redundancy.

First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end?

Thanks,

Marco


On 17 mei 2014, at 19:53, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan at go6.si> wrote:
> <snip>
>> But now we've got 3 very good candidates - Jen, Dave and Benedikt - and I
>> think we should rotate them in.
> 
> Excellent suggestion, let's rotate Jen, Dave and Benedikt in.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
> rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
> http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no
>